LGBT+ rights to association in Southeast Asia by Ryan

LGBT+ rights to association in Southeast Asia by Ryan

Note taking: Doris Yang / Editing: Leah Lin

ACFA (Asia Citizen Future Association) is honor to invite Ryan Silverio from ASEAN SOGIE Caucus to talk about LGBT+ rights in Southeast Asia having a focus on the rights to association in the Philippines. This is the record of the sharing of Ryan Silverio on ACFA's report launch forum on 22 August,"Exploring Taiwan's Roles Amid The Crisis of Closing Civic Space in the Southeast Asia" during the ACFA 2023 Taiwan and Southeast Asia Civil Society Week.


Ryan Silverio (they/them) is a gender queer human rights defender with more than 20 years experience in the non-profit sector. They worked in the intersections of human rights, child rights, and LGBTQIA+ rights in various capacities. Since 2014, Ryan has served as the Executive Director of ASEAN SOGIE Caucus (ASC), a regional human rights organization.

Under Ryan's leadership, ASC achieved key milestones, including transformation from a loose network into a registered non-government organization whose mission is to expand spaces for leadership and advocacy among LGBTQIA+ activists in Southeast Asia; sustained funding for a period of 9 years; and being granted with special consultative status by the UN ECOSOC.


ASEAN SOGIE Caucus (ASC) is a regional human rights organization and a networl focusing on LGBT+ issues. Its work covers 11 countries in Southeast Asia region.

When the ASC was trying to register in the Philippines, they ran into some challenges. The name, 'ASEAN SOGIE Caucus', was refused because 'ASEAN' was trademarked and 'SOGIE' is an acronym for 'sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression'.

The process of ASC's registration thus entailed a huge number of discussion by members from countries in ASEAN to come up with a name. Finally, the ASC decided to register as 'Southeast Asia Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Expression Caucus (ASC), Inc'.

Besides challenges during the registration process, the ASC also had to ensure that over half of the board members are Filipinos, which is in avoidance of being accused with the 'Anti-Dummy Law'. Anti-Dummy Law has been used to attack other civil society organizations in the Philippines.

ASC focuses on supporting LGBT+ groups to have access to the regional and international human rights mechanism, including the UPR processes and special procedures. It has supported more than 80 local initiatives of local organizations.

Encountering the trend of shrinking civic space in recent years, the ASC has to give priority to supporting emergency situation of activists as LGBT+ community have been targeted by many repressive governments among the region.

As a regional human rights organization, the ASC tried to get CSO accreditation from the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR), but it failed because Brunei vetoed ASC's application. Such rejection can be seen as an indication of the difficulties LGBT+ rights organizations face among Southeast Asia.

SOGIESC in Southeast Asia

The recognition of SOGIESC (sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics) as an inherent element of human rights obligation within ASEAN is very low.

Indonesia and Malaysia are two of the countries that have objected various Human Rights Council resolutions related to LGBT+ rights. Furthermore, state and non-state actors usually justify their harassment against LGBT+ rights as defending national security or protecting public morals.

Many Southeast Asian countries consider LGBT+ rights as Western agenda. In recent years, atacks against LGBT+ rights have been fueled by right-wing and conservative religious groups using rights-based principles. For example, freedom of religion, narrow interpretation of democracy, and the majority-minority dynamics have been used by such groups to claim that LGBT+ groups are minority, therefore they should not be recognized.

At the same time, criminalization of LGBT+ persons remain in Southeast Asia. Brunei, Myanmar, and Malaysia still enforce the British colonial position of the anti-sodomy law with the Section 377A of the Penal Code. Besides, there is a lack of legislation to protect LGBT+ persons from discrimination.

In the Philippines, for example, people have been advocating for an anti-discrimination bill for 20 years, but such bill has not been approved until today.
Furthermore, many LGBT+ persons, including a member of the ASC, have found themselves red-tagged and accused of being members of the communist party; therefore in need of protecting themselves from further repression.

Anti-LGBT+ attacks from Indonesia

Few months ago, the ASC has confronted a wave of anti-LGBT+ attacks. The ASC has been organizing the ASEAN Queer Advocacy Week (AAW) since 2016. The AAW is a capacity-building event involving LGBT+ activists around Southeast Asia to learn about ASEAN human rights mechanisms in Jakarta. The reason why the ASC hold the events in Jakarta is because Jakarta is ASEAN's political center; activists around the region get to meet various stakeholders in Jakarta.

Unfortunately, information about the AAW was leaked through a social media post of an influencer before the AAW in 2023. A wave of anti-LGBT sentiments has then been triggered, and reprisals happened against the ASC and other LGBT+ organizations and communities. The Islamic Brotherhood Front (Front Persaudaraan Islam) imposed a threat that they will call for Jihad if the AAW takes place; furthermore, the Indonesian Love Family Alliance, a conservative group supported by some parliamentarians, have issued a statement against the ASC saying that homosexuality can still be cured, and that it is a threat that has become widespread in Indonesia. Besides, the Indonesian Ulama Council's (Majelis Ulama Indonesia) chairperson condemned the event on national media, and accused the ASC as riot instigators. To make it worse, police have been mobilized to search all the hotels and event venues in Jakarta to make sure that no LGBT+ events will take place. There have been more than 300 online articles posted during the week when this wave of anti-LGBT sentiments took place to attack the ASC and the AAW.

There has been an escalating hate against the LGBT+ persons as the Indonesian Ulama Council signed an agreement with the local police in Riau to collectively ban LGBT activists and narcotics.

Despite the attack and anti-LGBT+ sentiments, there were no politicians taking stances to support LGBT+ rights; and the national human rights institution of Indonesia did not make any statement on the incidents.

Amid the crisis, however, solidarity is civil society's strength. A lot of human rights and pro-democracy organizations took a stance to support the ASC and LGBT+ groups. It is with the support that ASC is navigating through how to re-strategize their work in the region.

Read more:

Asia Citizen Future Association stands in solidarity with ASEAN SOGIE Caucus and LGBTQIA+ community in Indonesia
ACFA aims to connect civil society between Southeast Asia and Taiwan in order to confront the trend of the closing of civic space. We learn that ASEAN Queer Advocacy Week (AAW), which is organised by a Philippines-based rights group ASEAN SOGIE Caucus and Indonesia-based Arus Pelangi and other activ…

Read more



亞洲公民未來協會(ACFA)透過研究、培訓、網絡建構與公眾教育,串聯台灣與東南亞公民社會,共同關注並致力於減緩東南亞公民空間緊縮趨勢。 過去我們關注過泰國刑法112條藐視君主罪對青年行動者的危害。我們談過馬來西亞社團法與大專法案賦予行政權過大權力而有害於結社自由。印尼新刑法修正案(New Penal Code)中則明文規定禁止侮辱總統和國家體制。我們已然見證這些法案對東南亞公民社會開展行動和倡議所造成的風險與負面影響。 令人遺憾地,在台灣三一八運動的十年之際,我們目睹包含《立法院職權行使法》在內一系列不透明、未經充分討論、危害言論自由的國會擴權法案,以不符合程序正義與違背民主程序的舉手表決形式被強行二讀與通過。 由於該法案新增許多模糊未加以定義且有罰則的內容,包含:「反質詢」、「虛偽陳述」與「藐視國會」等。我們相信該法案一旦通過,在未來極有可能造成公民社會與民間團體因自身倡議與言論而遭受不同形式處罰的情形。 我們認為這樣的法案內容與審議程序,已足證這是一個國會濫權法案,也是擴權法案,是民主倒退,也是公民空間緊縮的徵兆。我們與四十多個公民社會組織站在一起,呼籲立法院退回該法案,重



這期的台灣東南亞關注小組的每月彙整,我們關注東南亞最大的民主國家—印尼。 印尼過去幾個月來與該國總統大選相關的憲法法院裁定時程。今年2月14日,印尼舉辦了全世界最大的單日選舉,最後由普拉伯沃與吉伯朗高票黨選接下來五年的正副總統,然而,此次大選卻引發諸多爭議。除了新總統當選者普拉伯沃是過去強人總統蘇哈托任內人權迫害的加害者外,準副總統吉伯朗(時任梭羅市長)是現任總統佐科威的長子。按照印尼的《選舉法(No.7/2017)》,吉伯朗因未滿40歲,不符合參選正副總統的年齡門檻。然而,2023年10月,以Anwar Usman (安華烏斯曼)為首席大法官的印尼憲法法院裁定,將正副總統參選人的門檻修改為年滿40歲或是未滿40歲但曾擔任民選的官員或民意代表。此舉被視為幫助時任梭羅(Surakarta)市長的吉伯朗參選開路。憲法法院裁定此案時,時任首席大法官安華是總統佐科威的妹婿。 雖然2023年11月,印尼憲法法院道德小組宣布,由於安華未規避其在此事件中的利益衝突,此舉違反道德規範,因此被解除首席大法官的職位,然而,安華依然保有其大法官的職位。大選後不久,落選的兩名候選人針對憲法法院裁定候選人年



亞洲公民未來協會致力於連結台灣與東南亞公民社會,共同發展抵禦公民空間緊縮危機的策略。近年來由於區域公民空間緊縮,隨著壓迫性政府持續打壓區域內的公民社會組織與人權捍衛者,新聞自由的空間也持續不斷受到打壓。然而,區域內的人權捍衛者、獨立記者與媒體仍持續發展不同策略以延續他們的工作以捍衛基本人權。 在本次活動中,我們很榮幸邀請到新加坡獨立記者與長期致力於廢除死刑工作的人權捍衛者Kirsten Han 韓俐穎分享她的工作經驗與歷程。這場座談可以讓我們了解一位獨立記者如何在具有挑戰的環境持續採訪與製作具備深度與觀點的議題新聞。 關於講者 Kirsten Han 韓俐穎是一位新家坡的獨立記者與人權捍衛者。除了經營《We, The Citizen》電子報之外,她也是《Mekong Review》的總編輯。此外,Kirsten是新加坡公民社會組織Transformative Justice Collective (TJC)的成員,長期致力於廢除死刑以及終止掃毒戰爭。Kirsten是一位作家,她曾出版《The Singapore I Recognise: Essays on home, c