"Harassment against NGOs in Thailand is still happening" a brief introduction of the right to association in Thailand

"Harassment against NGOs in Thailand is still happening" a brief introduction of the right to association in Thailand

Note taking: Doris Yang / Editing: Leah Lin

ACFA (Asia Citizen Future Association) is honor to invite Attorney Kunthika Nutcharut and Anon Chawalawan--Project Manager of iLaw, to talk about the current situation of freedom of association in Thailand for us to understand the current situation and trends of the shrinking of civil space in the country.  This is the record of the sharing of Kunthika Nutcharut and Anon Chawalawan on ACFA's report launch forum on 22 August,"Exploring Taiwan's Roles Amid The Crisis of Closing Civic Space in the Southeast Asia" during the ACFA 2023 Taiwan and Southeast Asia Civil Society Week.


Attorney Kunthika Nutcharut has been licensed since 2015. She is best known for her role as a criminal defense attorney, where she represents many of the leading political cases going on in Thailand at the moment.

Anon Chawalawan is Project Manager of iLaw, the Thai Human Rights Organization that is working to monitor violation against Freedom of Expression in Thailand and promote civic engagement in politics and legislative process. Before serve as project manager, Anon served as head of Freedom of Expression Documentation Center of iLaw responsible to lead the team of observer in the monitoring of Freedom of Expression trial especially Lese Majeste trial.

Moderator: Thompson Chau is a journalist covering news in Taiwan and Myanmar. He is Frontier Myanmar’s editor-at-large, and regularly writes for Nikkei Asia and the Economist. After more than five years reporting in Yangon, he relocated in early 2022 and now spends his time in Taiwan and Thailand. In April 2023, Thompson was elected President of the Taiwan Foreign Correspondents’ Club (TFCC). He is co-recipient of the 2021 Vivian Wu award, and has also written for the Financial Times, Al Jazeera, the Telegraph and other international outlets. He has an M.A. from Scotland’s University of St Andrews.

During the last decade, Thailand has been put into a political turmoil; it is not a secret that the military government has been trying to stop any kinds of civil society movement despite that both the local and international NGOs in Thailand have been fighting bravely for various human rights.

Interestingly, on paper, organizations that are engage in politics or political activities are not banned from registeration. However, they have to put on their charter that 'the purpose of the organization is to promote democracy with the king as the head of the state, and to remain neutral and to refrain from the support of any political party'.

According to the speakers, three worrying factors in Thailand's freedom of association:

(1) State-sponsored disinformation

Civil society activists and human rights defenders who are imprisoned sometimes are deprived the right to bail. They have to conduct hunger strikes until they almost lose their life in order to have their basic right to bail. In such cases, CSOs who step out to advocate for these political cases are subjected to state-sponsored disinformation

(2) Illegal access of information

The illegal access of information has been conducted systematically in Thailand. This could happen in different forms, such as the leak of information on activities or financial matters, or the authorities' arbitrarily request for documents without the courts' permission.

iLaw, along with other NGOs that criticize the military junta and push for the abolition of the royal defamation law have been targeted by the authority after the coup in 2014. Particularly, the authority visited the offices of the NGOs and request for documents without the court's permission. In response, iLaw allowed the authority to read the documents they request, but they told the authority that they will film their activity in iLaw's office and decide whether to publish online or not. After being told so, the authority decided to leave the office.

Although in the example of iLaw, they successfully stop the authority from harassing them, the illegal request and access for NGOs' information and documents by the authority have put other local and international CSOs operating in Thailand in danger.

(3) The NPO bill

In February 2021, the Thai Cabinet approved a NPO bill to impose restrictions and control on NGOs operating in Thailand. The bill is known for it's opaque and excessive wordings, the disproportional fines and penalties, its control over foreign fundings, and its authorization for  invasive inspecting mechanism for NGOs. The NPO bill was soon criticized strongly by the civil society and academia; therefore, until now it is still not enacted.

Interestingly, before the coming into being of the NPO bill, a lot of NGOs and older generations in Thailand were trying to push the government to pass a bill to facilitate NGO and human right activities, and to advocate for the government to fulfill its promise with the ratification of ICCPR. However, the NPO bill that the cabinet approved in 2021 was not the same idea that was envisioned by NGOs to promote freedom of association in Thailand.

Notably, due to the fact that Bangkok serves as the regional NGO hub of Southeast Asia, a lot of international and regional NGOs are operating in Thailand; if the NPO bill is enacted, it will affect all local, regional, and international non-profit organizations that are operating in Thailand.

Read more



亞洲公民未來協會(ACFA)透過研究、培訓、網絡建構與公眾教育,串聯台灣與東南亞公民社會,共同關注並致力於減緩東南亞公民空間緊縮趨勢。 過去我們關注過泰國刑法112條藐視君主罪對青年行動者的危害。我們談過馬來西亞社團法與大專法案賦予行政權過大權力而有害於結社自由。印尼新刑法修正案(New Penal Code)中則明文規定禁止侮辱總統和國家體制。我們已然見證這些法案對東南亞公民社會開展行動和倡議所造成的風險與負面影響。 令人遺憾地,在台灣三一八運動的十年之際,我們目睹包含《立法院職權行使法》在內一系列不透明、未經充分討論、危害言論自由的國會擴權法案,以不符合程序正義與違背民主程序的舉手表決形式被強行二讀與通過。 由於該法案新增許多模糊未加以定義且有罰則的內容,包含:「反質詢」、「虛偽陳述」與「藐視國會」等。我們相信該法案一旦通過,在未來極有可能造成公民社會與民間團體因自身倡議與言論而遭受不同形式處罰的情形。 我們認為這樣的法案內容與審議程序,已足證這是一個國會濫權法案,也是擴權法案,是民主倒退,也是公民空間緊縮的徵兆。我們與四十多個公民社會組織站在一起,呼籲立法院退回該法案,重



這期的台灣東南亞關注小組的每月彙整,我們關注東南亞最大的民主國家—印尼。 印尼過去幾個月來與該國總統大選相關的憲法法院裁定時程。今年2月14日,印尼舉辦了全世界最大的單日選舉,最後由普拉伯沃與吉伯朗高票黨選接下來五年的正副總統,然而,此次大選卻引發諸多爭議。除了新總統當選者普拉伯沃是過去強人總統蘇哈托任內人權迫害的加害者外,準副總統吉伯朗(時任梭羅市長)是現任總統佐科威的長子。按照印尼的《選舉法(No.7/2017)》,吉伯朗因未滿40歲,不符合參選正副總統的年齡門檻。然而,2023年10月,以Anwar Usman (安華烏斯曼)為首席大法官的印尼憲法法院裁定,將正副總統參選人的門檻修改為年滿40歲或是未滿40歲但曾擔任民選的官員或民意代表。此舉被視為幫助時任梭羅(Surakarta)市長的吉伯朗參選開路。憲法法院裁定此案時,時任首席大法官安華是總統佐科威的妹婿。 雖然2023年11月,印尼憲法法院道德小組宣布,由於安華未規避其在此事件中的利益衝突,此舉違反道德規範,因此被解除首席大法官的職位,然而,安華依然保有其大法官的職位。大選後不久,落選的兩名候選人針對憲法法院裁定候選人年



亞洲公民未來協會致力於連結台灣與東南亞公民社會,共同發展抵禦公民空間緊縮危機的策略。近年來由於區域公民空間緊縮,隨著壓迫性政府持續打壓區域內的公民社會組織與人權捍衛者,新聞自由的空間也持續不斷受到打壓。然而,區域內的人權捍衛者、獨立記者與媒體仍持續發展不同策略以延續他們的工作以捍衛基本人權。 在本次活動中,我們很榮幸邀請到新加坡獨立記者與長期致力於廢除死刑工作的人權捍衛者Kirsten Han 韓俐穎分享她的工作經驗與歷程。這場座談可以讓我們了解一位獨立記者如何在具有挑戰的環境持續採訪與製作具備深度與觀點的議題新聞。 關於講者 Kirsten Han 韓俐穎是一位新家坡的獨立記者與人權捍衛者。除了經營《We, The Citizen》電子報之外,她也是《Mekong Review》的總編輯。此外,Kirsten是新加坡公民社會組織Transformative Justice Collective (TJC)的成員,長期致力於廢除死刑以及終止掃毒戰爭。Kirsten是一位作家,她曾出版《The Singapore I Recognise: Essays on home, c