Stand in Solidarity with Malaysia Youth Human Rights Defender and Former Student Activist, Wong Yan Ke, in Practicing the Freedom of Expression in Malaysia

Stand in Solidarity with Malaysia Youth Human Rights Defender and Former Student Activist, Wong Yan Ke, in Practicing the Freedom of Expression in Malaysia


ACFA is dedicated to connecting civil societies between Taiwan and Southeast Asian in order to defend civic space.

We stand in solidarity with Wong Yan Ke, an youth human rights defender and the former student activist from Universiti Malaya (UM), who now serves as a coordinator in Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM), a human rights NGO in Malaysia.

Wong was found guilty under Section 504 of the Penal Code (which refers to intentionally insult a person and provoke a breach of peace) for a solo protest during his graduation ceremony in UM in 2019. After visiting the court for around 70 times from 2020 to 2023, the verdict of Wong's case will be announced on October 9, 2023.

On October 14, 2019, while receiving his bachelor's degree during UM's convocation ceremony, Wong Yan Ke staged a solo protest with a placard demanding the vice-chancellor to resign for his racism remarks in the Malay Dignity Congress. On the next day, the university lodged a police report accusing Wong of disrespecting the ceremony and forbid another student activist to participate in the convocation ceremony in order to prevent the protest from happening again.

Wong was investigated by the police on October 16, 2019, under Section 504 of the Penal Code; on the same day, when he returned to the university to collect his graduation scroll, the staff refused to give him his scroll while claiming that his scroll was 'dirty'. He was only allowed to collect his graduation scroll and academic transcript on October 19, 2019.

Wong was charged under Section 504 of the Penal Code in February 2020. The prosecution was proven a prima facie case in April 2022. He visited the court for around 70 times from 2020 to 2023. On October 9, 2023, the verdict for Wong's case will be announced. The punishment for the case could be up to a maximum of 2 years in jail or fine, or both.

Freedom of speech is a critical and a key pillar of civic space. While standing in solidarity with Wong Yan Ke, ACFA express our concern over the situation of freedom of speech in Malaysia.

  • We condemn the Universiti Malaya and the Malaysian authority for silencing student activism and the prosecution against a young citizen who was practicing his fundamental human rights of the right to the freedom of expression.
  • We urge the Malaysian government to take action to protect students' fundamental human rights to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of association.
#StopSilencingStudents #StudentActivismIsNotACrime #DefendCivicSpace #FreedomOfSpeech

For more information, go to SUARAM: https://www.facebook.com/suararakyatmalaysia

Read more

退回國會權力擴張法案,抵禦公民空間緊縮危機。

退回國會權力擴張法案,抵禦公民空間緊縮危機。

亞洲公民未來協會(ACFA)透過研究、培訓、網絡建構與公眾教育,串聯台灣與東南亞公民社會,共同關注並致力於減緩東南亞公民空間緊縮趨勢。 過去我們關注過泰國刑法112條藐視君主罪對青年行動者的危害。我們談過馬來西亞社團法與大專法案賦予行政權過大權力而有害於結社自由。印尼新刑法修正案(New Penal Code)中則明文規定禁止侮辱總統和國家體制。我們已然見證這些法案對東南亞公民社會開展行動和倡議所造成的風險與負面影響。 令人遺憾地,在台灣三一八運動的十年之際,我們目睹包含《立法院職權行使法》在內一系列不透明、未經充分討論、危害言論自由的國會擴權法案,以不符合程序正義與違背民主程序的舉手表決形式被強行二讀與通過。 由於該法案新增許多模糊未加以定義且有罰則的內容,包含:「反質詢」、「虛偽陳述」與「藐視國會」等。我們相信該法案一旦通過,在未來極有可能造成公民社會與民間團體因自身倡議與言論而遭受不同形式處罰的情形。 我們認為這樣的法案內容與審議程序,已足證這是一個國會濫權法案,也是擴權法案,是民主倒退,也是公民空間緊縮的徵兆。我們與四十多個公民社會組織站在一起,呼籲立法院退回該法案,重

是青年參政還是家族王朝?印尼2024總統大直選修憲爭議彙整

是青年參政還是家族王朝?印尼2024總統大直選修憲爭議彙整

這期的台灣東南亞關注小組的每月彙整,我們關注東南亞最大的民主國家—印尼。 印尼過去幾個月來與該國總統大選相關的憲法法院裁定時程。今年2月14日,印尼舉辦了全世界最大的單日選舉,最後由普拉伯沃與吉伯朗高票黨選接下來五年的正副總統,然而,此次大選卻引發諸多爭議。除了新總統當選者普拉伯沃是過去強人總統蘇哈托任內人權迫害的加害者外,準副總統吉伯朗(時任梭羅市長)是現任總統佐科威的長子。按照印尼的《選舉法(No.7/2017)》,吉伯朗因未滿40歲,不符合參選正副總統的年齡門檻。然而,2023年10月,以Anwar Usman (安華烏斯曼)為首席大法官的印尼憲法法院裁定,將正副總統參選人的門檻修改為年滿40歲或是未滿40歲但曾擔任民選的官員或民意代表。此舉被視為幫助時任梭羅(Surakarta)市長的吉伯朗參選開路。憲法法院裁定此案時,時任首席大法官安華是總統佐科威的妹婿。 雖然2023年11月,印尼憲法法院道德小組宣布,由於安華未規避其在此事件中的利益衝突,此舉違反道德規範,因此被解除首席大法官的職位,然而,安華依然保有其大法官的職位。大選後不久,落選的兩名候選人針對憲法法院裁定候選人年

【座談】我在新加坡做記者

【座談】我在新加坡做記者

亞洲公民未來協會致力於連結台灣與東南亞公民社會,共同發展抵禦公民空間緊縮危機的策略。近年來由於區域公民空間緊縮,隨著壓迫性政府持續打壓區域內的公民社會組織與人權捍衛者,新聞自由的空間也持續不斷受到打壓。然而,區域內的人權捍衛者、獨立記者與媒體仍持續發展不同策略以延續他們的工作以捍衛基本人權。 在本次活動中,我們很榮幸邀請到新加坡獨立記者與長期致力於廢除死刑工作的人權捍衛者Kirsten Han 韓俐穎分享她的工作經驗與歷程。這場座談可以讓我們了解一位獨立記者如何在具有挑戰的環境持續採訪與製作具備深度與觀點的議題新聞。 關於講者 Kirsten Han 韓俐穎是一位新家坡的獨立記者與人權捍衛者。除了經營《We, The Citizen》電子報之外,她也是《Mekong Review》的總編輯。此外,Kirsten是新加坡公民社會組織Transformative Justice Collective (TJC)的成員,長期致力於廢除死刑以及終止掃毒戰爭。Kirsten是一位作家,她曾出版《The Singapore I Recognise: Essays on home, c